Welcome to the ‘Navigating’ Series
We’re working our way through the various diagnoses that fall under the umbrella term of “eating disorder”. Even within these diagnoses there can be problematic restrictive behaviors that make diagnosis or identification of an eating disorder difficult. We include weight specifications, frequency of behaviors, and specific behavior breakdowns to narrowly fit only certain individuals into the criteria. For many people it might be more helpful to identify their experience as being primarily restrictive, compensatory, or maybe just that it involves uncomfortable overeating behaviors. This feels particularly true for people who fall under the umbrella of a restrictive eating disorder. We’ll talk about why that is in a second.
I notice that many people think that restrictive eating disorders are the most common way for someone to experience disordered eating. I think it goes back to health class and the images of emaciated, white females dominating the conversation about eating disorders. It may also tie to the misunderstanding that eating disorders are about desiring thinness or being “vain”. The reality is that anorexia is the least common eating disorder and even within this disorder many people have compensatory or bingeing behaviors. I talk about “restrictive” eating disorders more often than I really use the diagnostic title of anorexia because so many people experience restrictive behaviors outside of the context of the narrow diagnostic standards of anorexia nervosa. So, let’s get into it!
If you have any questions or additional considerations, please feel free to leave a comment!
Etiology
Restrictive eating disorders are commonly traced back to a desire for control when experiencing something difficult. It is a bit of a stereotype that does have some truth to it, but it is usually not the entire story. Once again, the restriction is usually serving a purpose to help cope with an event, experience, or just life itself. Restriction is commonly seen as the “desirable” eating disorder behavior as opposed to bingeing or purging. We associate restriction with discipline, losing weight, “successful” dieting, and an overcommitment to our health. It is hard for the general public to tell the difference between a diet and a restrictive eating disorder - oftentimes because diets are the precursor to the eating disorder. As things become more and more restrictive, there are important changes that start to occur related to the undernutrition.
Someone who is predisposed to a restrictive eating disorder has a slight difference in how their body reacts to undernutrition. We actually see that there are two important distinctions for those with anorexia than we see in the general public. First, for a person without anorexia, we see that when we feel hunger, then eat to satisfy that hunger, that after eating there is a reward response in our brains. AKA it feels good to eat food for most people. For someone with anorexia we don’t see that same feeling of satisfaction that comes after eating. On top of that, we also see that eating food might increase feelings of anxiety rather than helping to alleviate those feelings. These two variations in the psychology and biology of people with anorexia are part of the reason why they can maintain restriction for much longer than others and without having binge patterns break through. For the vast majority of people, their body will at some point get to the point where they feel out of control and turn to food. When this is the case, we get diagnoses like BED, bulimia, OSFED, or even just anorexia with binge/purge symptoms.
Beyond biology, we also live in an environment that is fueled by diet culture and beauty culture. The drive to fit into the impossible standards of the world can influence many people to experiment with dieting and restriction. Genetics and biology play their part in someone’s predisposition to developing an eating disorder, but then the environment, experience of trauma, inexperience with healthy coping behaviors, and many other life experiences are what fuel the development of disordered eating. Each story is different - no person’s eating disorder is really the same as someone else’s. The way our parents talk about food, our body shame, bullies, school education on food, exposure to dieting information, our traumatic experiences, having good models for coping, and friends can all play a role in our likelihood to turn to disordered eating that may progress to an eating disorder.
Behaviors, signs, symptoms
There are very strict diagnostic criteria to meet the definition of anorexia. Due to this we miss people who are in bigger bodies who are using these behaviors, we miss people who a typical healthcare practitioner might not deem “concerningly underweight”, and we miss people who might be good at talking through the positives of their diet (orthorexia). With that, we’ll start with the DSM criteria for anorexia and then, as always, get into my thoughts as a practitioner. To meet DSM criteria for anorexia you must have:
Restriction of energy intake relative to requirements leading to a significantly low body weight in the context of age, sex, developmental trajectory, and physical health.
Intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat, even though underweight.
Disturbance in the way in which one’s body weight or shape is experienced, undue influence of body weight or shape on self-evaluation, or denial of the seriousness of the current low body weight.
(My addition) Even if all the DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa are not met, a serious eating disorder can still be present. Atypical anorexia includes those individuals who meet the criteria for anorexia but who are not underweight despite significant weight loss. Research studies have not found a difference in the medical and psychological impacts of anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa.
コメント